About Rachel Stubbs

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Rachel Stubbs contributed 40 entries already.

Entries by Rachel Stubbs

Enough money spent on Lawyers

/in

Enough money spent on Lawyers

 

 

The Handshake in Highett

Sarah and Mark sat at a kitchen table in Highett, Melbourne, with a single sheet of notebook paper between them. After twelve years of marriage, they had decided to part ways. The atmosphere wasn’t joyful, but it was civil.

“We sell the house, split the equity 60/40 because you’re keeping the primary care of the kids, and we keep our own super,” Mark said. “And the kids stay with you every second weekend and Wednesday nights,” Sarah added. “Agreed?” “Agreed.”

They had researched online and found that Consent Orders were the “gold standard”—a way to make their handshake deal legally binding without ever stepping foot into the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia at William Street. They just needed lawyers to “format it correctly” and provide the required independent advice.

The Appointment at Firm A: “The Aggressor”

Sarah went to a high-rise firm in the Melbourne CBD. Her lawyer, Julian, sat behind a mahogany desk. Sarah presented the notebook paper.

“We have an agreement,” she said. “I just need the Consent Orders drafted.”

Julian leaned back and sighed. “Sarah, I appreciate your optimism, but I see a lot of ‘red flags’ here. A 60/40 split? You’ve been out of the workforce for years. In this Melbourne market, 70/30 is your ‘true’ entitlement. If you sign this now, you are leaving hundreds of thousands of dollars on the table. And this ‘every second weekend’ for Mark? That’s quite generous. Does he even have a proper spare room in his new rental?”

By the time Sarah left, the “civil” agreement felt like a trap she’d almost walked into. Julian convinced her to let him “send a formal opening letter” to “protect her interests.”

Initial Retainer: $3,500.

The Appointment at Firm B: “The Defender”

Mark went to a boutique firm in South Yarra. He told his lawyer, Fiona, about the deal. Two days later, Julian’s letter arrived on Fiona’s desk. It didn’t mention the 60/40 split. It demanded 75/30, full disclosure of Mark’s hidden business assets, and suggested that Mark’s proposed parenting time was “unstable.”

Fiona’s eyes lit up. “Mark, this is a declaration of war. They are coming for your business. If we don’t respond aggressively, the Court will think you’re hiding something. We need to demand a full forensic audit of your superannuation and Sarah’s family trust.”

“But there is no family trust,” Mark said, confused. “We don’t know that until we Discovery,” Fiona replied. “Trust no one.”

Initial Retainer: $5,000.

The Paper War Begins

For the next three months, the notebook paper in Highett was forgotten. In its place was a mountain of legal correspondence.

Julian (Sarah’s lawyer) sent a 14-page letter questioning Mark’s “capacity to provide a nutritious diet” during his Wednesday night visits. Fiona (Mark’s lawyer) responded with a 20-page demand for bank statements dating back to 2014.

Every time Sarah called Julian to say, “Can’t we just go back to the original deal?” Julian would warn her about “precedent” and “finality,” charging $90 per six-minute block to do so. Every time Mark complained to Fiona about the cost, she reminded him that “losing the house would be more expensive.”

The civil Sunday afternoon handovers of the children became silent and icy. Sarah began to wonder if Mark was hiding money. Mark began to wonder if Sarah was trying to alienate him from the kids. The lawyers’ letters had become their only form of communication.

The Breaking Point

Six months later, a “Conciliation Conference” was scheduled. Both parties sat in separate rooms in a glass-walled office overlooking the Yarra River.

Sarah looked at her latest invoice. Total so far: $22,000. Mark looked at his. Total so far: $26,500.

The lawyers spent four hours arguing over the “definition of household chattels” and whether the 2018 Mazda CX-5 should be valued at Redbook “trade-in” or “private sale” price.

By 4:00 PM, Julian walked into Sarah’s room. “They won’t budge on the 70/30. We should probably consider filing a formal Initiating Application in Court to show them we’re serious. That will require a $15,000 top-up on the retainer.”

Across the hall, Fiona told Mark, “She’s being unreasonable. We need to go to a contested hearing. It’s the only way to protect your business.”

The Epilogue: No Orders, No Money

Sarah and Mark met in the parking lot after the conference. They were both pale.

“I’ve spent fifty grand,” Mark whispered. “That was the kids’ private school fund.” “I’ve spent forty,” Sarah said. “And we still don’t have the Orders. The bank won’t refinance the mortgage because there’s no signed agreement.”

The “agreement” they had reached for free on a piece of notebook paper had been incinerated by a system designed for conflict. Because the lawyers had turned a “Consent Order” process into a “Litigation” process, the Court had not seen a single document. There were no orders. There was no closure.

They eventually fired their lawyers and started again with a fixed-fee mediator, but the $90,000 was gone—transferred from a family’s future into the billable hours of the Melbourne legal elite.

2026 Changes to the Family Law system

/in

Changes to the Family Law system in 2026

  1. The Death of the “Two-Year Rule”

Previously, if you had been married for less than two years, the Court made you jump through extra hoops to prove you had tried to save the marriage.

  • No More Mandatory Counselling: You are no longer required to attend marriage counselling or obtain a “Counselling Certificate” just because you’ve been married for less than two years.
  • No More Special Leave: You no longer need to ask the Court for “special permission” (leave) to file for divorce early.
  • The Only Rule Remaining: You must still be separated for at least 12 months and one day before you can apply. As long as you meet this separation requirement, the total length of your marriage is now legally irrelevant to the application process.

  1. No More Mandatory Court Attendance Divorce Applications 

One of the biggest practical changes in 2026 is that almost no one has to go to court for a divorce anymore.

  • Sole Applications with Children: Previously, if you filed alone and had kids under 18, you had to attend the hearing.  Now, as long as the paperwork is clear and the other party doesn’t object, the Court can grant the divorce in your absence.
  • Exceptions: You only need to attend now if the Court specifically identifies an issue (like conflicting information about children’s safety) or if one party formally requests a hearing.

  1. Broader Recognition of Family Violence

While divorce itself remains “no-fault,” the 2026 legal landscape treats family violence—including economic abuse—with much higher priority in the surrounding property and parenting matters.

  • Economic Abuse: The law now explicitly defines things like “unreasonably denying financial autonomy” or “dowry abuse” as family violence.
  • Impact on Property: If there was family violence, the Court now has a clearer mandate to consider how that abuse affected your ability to contribute to the household or earn an income when it comes to splitting assets.
  1. New Rules for “Companion Animals” (Pets)

For the first time, pets are being treated as more than just “furniture” in Australian family law.

  • If you and your spouse can’t agree on who keeps the dog or cat, the Court can now make specific orders based on the pet’s welfare, who has the strongest attachment to the animal, and any history of animal cruelty as a form of family violence.

Summary of 2026 vs. Old Rules

Feature

Old Rules (Pre-June 2025)

New Rules (2026)

Married < 2 Years

Must attend counselling + file certificate.

No counselling required.

Court Attendance

Mandatory for sole applicants with kids.

Generally not required for anyone.

Economic Abuse

Hard to prove as a factor in property.

Explicitly defined and weighted.

Family Pets

Treated as inanimate property.

Special welfare factors considered.

 

Consent Orders – Property and Children at the same time

/in

Why should you get your Property and Children’s Consent Orders at the same time

In Melbourne, many people choose to handle their property split and their parenting arrangements as two separate tasks. However, combining them into a single set of Consent Orders is often the smartest move for a “clean break.”

Here are the primary benefits of handling both at once:

1. Cost and Efficiency

Filing for Consent Orders involves a court filing fee (currently around $205 (01/01/2026) in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia). If you file for property orders now and decide to do parenting orders six months later, you will likely have to pay that fee twice. By doing them together, you only pay one filing fee and your lawyer only has to draft and file one set of application documents. It’s essentially a “two-for-one” deal on the legal process.

2. Strategic “Package” Negotiations

Separation is rarely just about one thing; everything is interconnected. For example, you might agree to let one parent stay in the family home (property) because it is closer to the children’s school (parenting). By negotiating both at the same time, you can create a “global settlement” where the financial arrangements actually support the practicalities of raising your children. It allows for trade-offs that make sense for your family’s specific lifestyle.

3. Total Finality (The “Clean Break”)

If you only settle the property side, the “door” is still open for disputes regarding the children. If you only settle the kids’ side, your finances remain tangled. Doing both simultaneously provides a complete legal “off-ramp.” Once the court approves the orders, every major aspect of your former life is legally resolved. This prevents one person from using a property dispute as “leverage” in a parenting argument (or vice versa) later down the road.

4. Meeting the Court’s “Just and Equitable” Test

When a Court Registrar looks at your property split, they have to decide if it is fair. One of the main things they look at is the future needs of each person, which almost always depends on who is looking after the children and for how much time. If the Court sees the parenting orders and the property orders together, it’s much easier for them to see why the money is being split a certain way. It provides the “full picture” that makes a Judge or Registrar more likely to approve the deal quickly. Property and Children’s in Consent Orders at the same time make sense

5. Emotional Closure – Property and Children’s in Consent Orders

Separating is emotionally draining. Stretching the process out by dealing with property in January and children in June keeps you in a state of “legal limbo.” Completing both at once allows you to sign the papers, wait for the court’s approval, and then truly move on. It reduces the number of times you have to sit down with a lawyer or negotiate with your ex, which is often the biggest relief for people living in Victoria.

 

5 reasons to get Consent Orders in Melbourne

/in

The Ultimate Guide to Consent Orders in Melbourne: Why Your “Handshake Deal” Needs Legal Teeth

Separating from a partner is one of the most stressful life events you can experience. Once the emotional dust begins to settle, most couples in Melbourne find themselves sitting across from one another trying to figure out the “business” of their breakup: who gets the house, how the superannuation is split, and—most importantly—how they will raise their children.

 

If you and your ex-partner are on good terms, you might reach an agreement quickly. You might feel that a verbal agreement or a simple written note is enough. However, in the world of Australian Family Law, an informal agreement is often not worth the paper it’s written on.

To turn your agreement into a permanent, legally binding reality, you need Consent Orders. Here is a deep dive into the five essential reasons why you need these orders and why a Family Lawyer is the only person who can ensure they actually protect you.

 

1. Turning a “Pinky Swear” into a Legal Shield

The most common mistake people make is assuming that because their ex-partner is being “reasonable” now, they will stay that way forever. Life changes: people get new partners, they lose jobs, or they simply change their minds.

Without Consent Orders in Melbourne, your agreement is merely a statement of intent. If you agreed that the kids would spend every second weekend with you, but your ex-partner suddenly decides to move to the other side of Victoria, you have no immediate legal power to stop them. You would have to start a court case from scratch, which is expensive and exhausting.

How Consent Orders Change the Game: When the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia issue a  Consent Orders, they carry the same weight as if a Judge had sat through a trial and made a ruling. If a party breaches an order, they are in “contempt of court.” This allows you to file for “Contravention” (enforcement), giving the court the power to order makeup time with children, impose fines, or even issue warrants. It moves the conversation from “Please follow our deal” to “You must follow the law.”

 
 

2. The Financial “Clean Break”: Protecting Your Future Self

Many people believe that once they move out and separate their bank accounts, their financial ties are severed. This is a dangerous myth. In Australia, the right to claim a property settlement can stay open for a long time—usually 12 months after a divorce or 2 years after a de facto separation. Even then, people can sometimes apply for “leave” to file a claim much later.

The “Post-Separation Growth” Risk: Imagine you separate today, and five years from now, you’ve worked incredibly hard, started a successful business in Melbourne, or received a large inheritance. Without a Consent Order finalised at the time of your split, your ex-partner could potentially return and claim a portion of those new assets because your financial relationship was never “legally” ended.

Why a Lawyer is Essential: A Family Lawyer ensures that the Consent Orders include a “finality clause.” This effectively bricks up the door to your financial life. It ensures that once the assets are divided as agreed, neither party can ever come back for “round two.” It provides the peace of mind you need to rebuild your wealth without looking over your shoulder.

3. Saving Tens of Thousands in Taxes (The “Stamp Duty Hack”)

This is perhaps the most practical, “dollars and cents” reason to get Consent Orders in Melbourne. When you transfer property—such as the family home in a Melbourne suburb—from joint names into one person’s name, the State Government usually views this as a “sale” or “transfer,” which triggers Stamp Duty.

Given Melbourne’s property prices, Stamp Duty can easily cost $30,000, $40,000, or more.

The Legal Exemption: The Victorian State Revenue Office provides an exemption for Stamp Duty on property transfers arising from a relationship breakdown—but only if there is a formal Court Order or a Binding Financial Agreement. * If you just go to a conveyancer with a “handshake deal,” you will likely be hit with the full tax bill.

 

  • If you go with a Consent Order, that tax usually disappears.

The savings on Stamp Duty alone often far outweigh the cost of hiring a Family Lawyer to draft the orders. Furthermore, Consent Orders allow for Superannuation Splitting. You cannot simply transfer $100,000 from your ex’s Super to yours; the Superannuation Trustee is legally forbidden from moving that money without a formal court order.

 

4. Precision Drafting: Avoiding the “Vague Language” Trap

When people draft their own agreements, they tend to use “common sense” language. Unfortunately, common sense is the first thing to disappear during a dispute.

The Problem with DIY Orders: If you write: “The parties will split the costs of the children’s schooling,” what does that actually mean? Does it include uniforms? Laptop levies? School trips to Canberra? Private tutoring? If your ex-partner says “no” to a specific expense, your DIY agreement is too vague to enforce.

The Lawyer’s “Crystal Ball”: A Family Lawyer has seen where agreements fail. They act as a “future-proofer.” When they draft your Minute of Order, they use precise legal terms. They will define exactly what “school costs” means. They will set specific times for child changeovers (e.g., “3:00 PM at the front gate of the school”). They will include “default clauses”—for example, what happens if the family home doesn’t sell within 90 days? Who pays the mortgage in the meantime?

 

A lawyer thinks about the “what ifs” so you don’t have to.

5. The “Fairness” Check: Getting Past the Court Gatekeeper

You don’t just “file” Consent Orders; you apply for them. A Registrar at the Court must review your proposed deal to ensure it is “just and equitable.” This means the court won’t let one person walk away with 100% of the assets while the other gets nothing, even if both people agreed to it.

Why the Court Rejects Applications: The court is especially protective of children’s rights. If your parenting orders don’t seem to be in the “best interests of the child,” or if your financial split is wildly lopsided without a very good legal explanation, the Registrar will reject the application.

 

The Value of Legal Advice: A lawyer knows the “formula” the court uses. They will draft an “Affidavit” or an “Application for Consent Orders” that explains to the court why the deal is fair. For example, if you are taking less of the house because you are keeping your entire Superannuation balance, a lawyer knows how to present that “trade-off” so the court understands and approves it.

Hiring a lawyer ensures your application is approved the first time, avoiding the stress of “requisitions” (the court asking for corrections) which can delay your settlement by months.

 

Conclusion: Investing in Your Peace of Mind

At first glance, hiring a Family Lawyer to draft Consent Orders might seem like an unnecessary expense, especially if you and your ex are getting along. However, when you consider the potential for future lawsuits, the massive savings on Stamp Duty, and the absolute certainty that your children’s schedule is locked in, it is the most important investment you can make in your post-separation life.

Getting your Consent Orders in Melbourne take the “what ifs” out of your future. They allow you to wake up tomorrow knowing that the law of Australia protects your home, your money, and your time with your children.

 

Splitting military Superannuation

/in

Splitting Military Superannuation

 

Splitting military superannuation (such as MSBS, DFRDB, or ADF Super) is significantly more complex than splitting a standard retail or industry fund. Because these are “Defined Benefit” schemes, they require a specialized legal and actuarial approach to ensure the split is valid and fair.

 

The Process of Splitting Military Super

Formalising a split through Consent Orders follows a strict multi-step path:

  1. Information Request (Form 6): You or your spouse must lodge a “Form 6” with the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (CSC). This compels the fund to provide a Superannuation Information Form (SIF) containing the raw data needed for valuation.
  2. Actuarial Valuation: Because military funds don’t have a simple “cash balance,” an actuary uses the SIF data to calculate the Family Law Value. This converts the future pension promise into a present-day dollar figure.
  3. Drafting the Orders: Specialist lawyers draft the Minute of Order using precise “splitting clauses.” For example, MSBS requires orders to address both “Associate A” (taxed) and “Associate B” (untaxed) components.
  4. Procedural Fairness: Before filing with the Court, you must send the draft orders to CSC. They have 28 days to review the wording and provide a “Letter of Procedural Fairness” confirming they can implement the split.
  5. Court Approval: The Application for Consent Orders and the Minute of Order are filed in the Federal Circuit and Family Court. A Registrar reviews them to ensure the split is “just and equitable.”
  6. Implementation: Once the Court “seals” (approves) the orders, a certified copy is served on CSC. They then create a separate account for the non-member spouse (the “Associate”).

 

Why Use a Specialist Family Lawyer to Splitting military Superannuation?

Military superannuation is governed by both the Family Law Act 1975 and specific military legislation. A specialist ensures:

  • Fund Compliance: CSC is notorious for rejecting orders that use “standard” wording. A specialist knows the exact phrases required for MSBS vs. DFRDB.
  • The “Dual Split” Requirement: For DFRDB members, the Productivity Benefit Scheme (PBS) is a separate legal interest. If your lawyer forgets to include the PBS in the orders, you could miss out on a significant portion of the settlement.
  • Speed: Firms like Kate Austin Family Law specialize in 24-hour drafting, preventing the “negotiation fatigue” that often causes amicable deals to fall apart
  •  

Common DIY Mistakes

People who attempt this without specialist advice often encounter these “deal-breakers”:

  • Using the Annual Statement Value: The value on your annual member statement is usually the “resignation value.” The Family Law Value (calculated by an actuary) is often much higher. Using the wrong number can result in one spouse unknowingly giving away hundreds of thousands of dollars in future value.
  • Forgetting Procedural Fairness: Filing with the Court without the CSC “Letter of Procedural Fairness” is an automatic rejection.
  • Incorrect Splitting Methods: Trying to split a pension in payment (where the member is already retired) using “growth phase” wording. These require two completely different legal formulas.
  • Tax Ignorance: Failing to account for how “Associate B” benefits are taxed when eventually accessed, which can lead to an unfair net-wealth distribution.

 

How Actuaries Assist in Splitting military Superannuation

In a military split, the actuary is the “financial valuer.” They are necessary because:

  • Formula Calculation: They apply the Family Law (Superannuation) Regulations 2025 to determine the present value of a lifetime pension.
  • Fairness: They provide the Court with the “true” value of the asset so the judge can determine if the overall property split is fair.
  • Pension Projections: They can model how much a member’s future pension will be reduced by a $100,000 or 50% split, allowing for informed negotiations.

 

Frequently Asked Questions

 

Can I get my share of the military super as cash now?

No. Superannuation remains “preserved.” It will be moved into a separate account for the non-member spouse, but it cannot be accessed until they reach their own preservation age (usually 60) or meet another condition of release.

Does a split stop the member’s pension?

If the member is already receiving a pension, a “payment split” will reduce their fortnightly payment by the ordered percentage, and that portion will be paid directly to the ex-spouse. It does not stop the pension; it reroutes a portion of it.

What is the difference between MSBS and DFRDB Splitting military Superannuation?

MSBS is usually split as a base amount (a specific dollar figure), which creates a new “Associate” account. DFRDB is almost always split as a percentage of each pension payment because of its unique structure as a defined benefit pension scheme.

Types of military Superannuation 

Consent Orders and Capital Gains Tax

/in

Consent Orders and Capital Gains tax. 

The most important consequence for Consent Orders and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) when a property is transferred between two people under Australian family law Consent Orders is the application of CGT Rollover Relief.

This relief effectively defers the CGT liability from the transferring party to the receiving party.

CGT Rollover Relief is Automatic

The transfer of a CGT asset (like an investment property or a rental property) between spouses or former spouses due to the breakdown of a relationship is generally subject to an automatic CGT rollover, provided it is done pursuant to a formal Family Law order.

  • Triggering Event: The Consent Orders, which are a legally binding court order under the Family Law Act 1975, are a qualifying agreement that triggers this relief.
  • The Transferring Party (Transferor): The person who transfers their share of the property disregards any capital gain or loss that would normally arise from the transfer. They have no CGT liability at the time of the transfer.
  • The Receiving Party (Transferee): The person who receives the property inherits the original cost base of the transferring party. The latent CGT liability is essentially “rolled over” to them..

The Deferred CGT Liability

The CGT is not eliminated; it is merely postponed until the receiving party eventually sells or disposes of the asset to a third party.

  • Calculating Future CGT: When the receiving party eventually sells the property, their capital gain will be calculated using the original cost base of the property (the price and costs paid when the couple, or the original owner, first acquired the property).
  • 50% CGT Discount: The receiving party can still qualify for the 50% CGT discount if they hold the asset for a combined total of at least 12 months (including the time the former spouse owned it) before the final sale.

Main Residence Exemption

If the property transferred was the former main residence of the couple, it will usually be completely exempt from CGT for both parties, as long as it qualified for the main residence exemption during the period of joint ownership.

Capital Gains Tax and Consent Orders

The rollover provisions ensure that the transfer to the receiving spouse does not trigger CGT liability, and that spouse can generally continue treating the property as their main residence for CGT purposes.

Summary of the Rollover Effect

Party

Action

CGT Outcome

Transferor

Transfers their interest under the Consent Order.

Disregards any capital gain/loss at the time of transfer (no tax is paid).

Transferee

Receives the interest under the Consent Order.

Inherits the transferor’s original cost base and holding period. Pays CGT when they eventually sell the asset.

Important Note:

While the Consent Orders provide the CGT rollover relief, you should always seek specific advice from a qualified Family Lawyer and a Tax Accountant before finalising any property settlement to ensure the orders are correctly drafted, and all tax implications are fully understood. The CGT liability (even if deferred) must be adequately considered when dividing the overall asset pool.

Why do Banks request Consent Orders as part of the loan approval process?

/in

Why are Banks and Consent Orders linked in the loan approval process?

When you separate and need to refinance a mortgage or take out a new loan to “buy out” your partner, Australian banks will almost always insist on seeing a sealed copy of Consent Orders.

This isn’t just bureaucratic red tape; it is a critical risk-management step for the lender and a significant tax-saving step for you.

 

Banks and Consent Orders

 

1. Why Banks Require Consent Orders

Banks view separation as a “high-risk” event. Without formal orders, they face two major problems:

  • Financial Uncertainty (The “Re-opening” Risk): If a bank lends you money to buy out your ex based only on an informal agreement, there is nothing stopping your ex from going to court a year later to ask for more. If the court grants them a larger share of the house, the bank’s security (the property) is at risk.

  • Serviceability: The bank needs to know exactly what your liabilities are. Consent Orders clarify who is responsible for which debts, whether child support or spousal maintenance is payable, and exactly how much cash you need to pay out.

 

2. The Legislative Connection: Stamp Duty & Section 90L

The most compelling reason for you to provide Consent Orders to a bank is the Stamp Duty exemption.

  • Section 90L (for marriages) and Section 90WA (for de facto relationships): These sections of the Family Law Act 1975 provide that certain “maintenance instruments” (like Consent Orders) are exempt from duty/tax.2

     

  • The Benefit: In most Australian states, transferring a share of a house from one partner to another normally triggers thousands (or tens of thousands) of dollars in Stamp Duty.3 However, if the transfer is done “pursuant to an order of the court,” you can generally apply for a formal exemption.4

     
     

  • Bank Requirement: Banks will rarely settle a loan if they see a massive Stamp Duty bill looming that hasn’t been accounted for. They want to see the Consent Orders to ensure the transfer will be “stamped” for a nominal fee (usually $0 or a small administrative fee) rather than full duty.

 

 

3. How a Family Lawyer Assists in This Process

Navigating a bank’s requirements while simultaneously dealing with the Family Court can be overwhelming. A family lawyer bridges that gap by:

  • Drafting “Bank-Ready” Orders: Banks are very specific about the wording they require to release a party from a mortgage. A lawyer ensures the orders include the necessary “machinery provisions” (the step-by-step instructions) for the sale or transfer of the property.

  • Coordinating with the Lender: Your lawyer can provide the bank with a “letter of comfort” or a draft copy of the orders to speed up the valuation and finance approval process.

  • Managing Third-Party Interests: Under Part VIIIB of the Act, the court can make orders that affect third parties (like banks).5 A lawyer ensures the bank is “put on notice” of the proposed orders, which is a legal requirement if the orders affect the bank’s mortgage.

     

  • Ensuring the “Clean Break”: As mentioned earlier, the lawyer ensures the orders satisfy Section 81, giving the bank the confidence that the financial relationship is truly over.

 

The Summary of Benefits – Consent Orders

 

Feature Without Consent Orders With Consent Orders
Stamp Duty Full duty payable (can be $20k+) Exempt (usually $0)
Bank Approval Difficult/High Risk Standard Procedure
Future Claims Relationship remains “open” Finality (The “Clean Break”)
Mortgage Transfer Both parties likely stay on the debt Ex-partner removed from liability

Consent Orders finalise the financial arrangements.

/in

Consent Orders are Final: Why Consent Orders are the Gold Standard

When a relationship ends, the emotional toll is often accompanied by significant financial uncertainty. One of the most common questions we hear is: “How do I make sure my ex-partner can’t come back for more money years down the track?” are Consent Orders are Final

The answer lies in Consent Orders. These are legally binding documents approved by the Family Court that formalise the division of assets, liabilities, and superannuation.

Here is why they are essential for protecting your financial future and how the process works.

 

Consent Orders are Final 

 

1. Why Consent Orders Provide Finality

Unlike an informal “handshake agreement” or a simple written note, Consent Orders carry the weight of the law. They achieve finality because:

  • The “Clean Break” Principle: The Family Law Act encourages the court to make orders that will finally determine the financial relationships between the parties and avoid further proceedings.

  • Legal Immunity: Once the court issues these orders, neither party can simply change their mind or ask for a “re-do” because they feel they made a bad deal.

  • Enforceability: If one party refuses to sell a house or transfer funds as agreed, the orders provide a clear legal mechanism to force compliance.

 

2. How the Process Works

To achieve this finality, you don’t necessarily have to step foot in a courtroom.

  1. Agreement: You and your former partner agree on how to split your property.

  2. Application: You file an Application for Consent Orders along with a draft of the specific orders you want the court to make.

  3. Full Disclosure: Both parties must provide a transparent picture of their financial position.

  4. Court Review: A Registrar reviews the documents. They do not just “rubber-stamp” them; they must be satisfied that the agreement is “just and equitable” (fair) to both parties under the law.

 

 

3. The “Windfall” Scenario: What Happens Next?

A major concern for many is what happens if one person’s financial situation improves drastically after the separation—for example, through an inheritance, a lottery win, or a successful business venture.

The General Rule: Once the Court has approved your Consent Orders, the financial tie is severed. If you receive a financial windfall after the orders are made, that money is generally yours to keep. Because the “book is closed,” your former partner typically has no legal claim to assets acquired post-settlement.

The Exception: The only way a party can usually “re-open” a settled property matter is if they can prove:

  • Non-disclosure: One party hid assets during the original process.

  • Fraud or Duress: The agreement was reached through lies or illegal pressure.

  • Impracticability: Circumstances have changed so much that the orders can no longer be carried out.

Important Note: This is why “Full and Frank Disclosure” is the most vital requirement. If you hide a bank account now to protect it, you risk your entire settlement being overturned later if that account is discovered.

 

4. Requirements for a Binding Order

To ensure your Consent Orders are bulletproof, the following must be met:

  • Proper Drafting: The orders must be written in specific legal terms that the Court accepts.

  • Just and Equitable: The split must fall within a range that the Court deems fair based on contributions and future needs.

  • Independent Legal Advice: While not strictly mandatory for Consent Orders (unlike Binding Financial Agreements), it is highly recommended to ensure you understand exactly what rights you are signing away.

 

Take Control of Your Tomorrow – Consent Orders are Final

Finalising your property matters isn’t just about dividing what you have now; it’s about protecting what you will build in the future. Without formal orders, your financial world remains “open” to claims for years to come.

Australia, the primary authority for property settlements is the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). The legal “teeth” behind Consent Orders come from specific sections that mandate finality and ensure the agreement is legally enforceable.

The following sections provide the legal basis for why and how these orders finalise your financial relationship.

Which sections of the legislation give finality to joint financial affairs?

 

1. The “Clean Break” Principle: Section 81

This is the most important section regarding finality. Section 81 (for married couples) and its de facto equivalent Section 90ST explicitly state that:

“The court shall, as far as practicable, make such orders as will finally determine the financial relationships between the parties… and avoid further proceedings between them.”

This is the legislative “instruction” to the court to ensure that once the orders are made, the financial tie is severed forever.

 

2. The Power to Alter Property: Section 79

Section 79 (for married couples) and Section 90SM (for de facto couples) grant the Court the power to actually change who owns what.

  • It allows the Court to take property belonging to one person and give it to the other.

  • Without an order made under this section, a “private agreement” doesn’t actually change the legal ownership in a way that prevents future claims.

 

3. The Requirement for Fairness: Section 79(2)

For a Consent Order to be approved, the Court must be satisfied under Section 79(2) that the orders are “just and equitable.” * This is why you cannot simply “give everything to one person” if it leaves the other person with nothing.

  • The Court acts as a gatekeeper to ensure the agreement is fair, which is what makes it so difficult for one party to challenge or overturn later.

 

4. The “Safety Valve”: Section 79A

You asked about windfalls. Section 79A is the part of the Act that explains when an order can be set aside. It is intentionally very strict to protect the finality of the settlement. An order can generally only be re-opened if:

  • There has been a “miscarriage of justice” (e.g., fraud, duress, or hiding assets).

  • It has become “impracticable” to carry out the orders.

  • A party has defaulted on the agreement.

Because a post-settlement windfall (like a lottery win or inheritance) does not fall under these categories, Section 79A actually protects the person who received the windfall by preventing the other party from easily re-opening the case.

 

 

Summary Table: The Legislative Framework. Why Consent Orders are Final

Provision Purpose Effect
Section 81 The Clean Break Mandates that the court ends the financial relationship.
Section 79 Property Adjustment Gives the court the power to legally transfer assets.
Section 79(2) Just & Equitable Ensures the deal is fair so it cannot be easily challenged.
Section 79A Varying Orders Restricts the grounds for “re-opening” the case later.

Stamp Duty Concessions for Spouses in Canberra

/in

What are the Stamp Duty exemptions for all parties in Canberra

Divorce and relationship breakdowns in the ACT are treated as a special case for stamp duty purposes, and there is a specific Stamp Duty in Canberra available to spouses.

Here’s a breakdown of how it works in Canberra if you’re selling a home due to a divorce and want to buy a new one.

Key Exemption for Property Transfer to a Former Partner

The primary exemption related to a family law property settlement applies to the transfer of property between former partners. If, as part of your divorce, your share of the family home is transferred to your former spouse, that specific transaction is exempt from stamp duty. This is because the transfer is considered a distribution of matrimonial property, resulting from the end of a relationship, rather than a typical market sale.

To be eligible for this exemption, the transfer must be formally documented through a legally recognised instrument, such as:

    1. A court order under the Family Law Act 1975. ( Consent Orders) 
    2. A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) under the Family Law Act.

An informal agreement will not be sufficient to claim this exemption.

Stamp Duty Concession for Your New Home Purchase

This is the part that is particularly relevant to your situation. The ACT has a specific concession that assists an individual who has had to sell their home as a result of a relationship breakdown.

The ACT Home Buyer Concession Scheme (HBCS) has a specific provision for people who are separating from a domestic partner or spouse. This change was introduced to help individuals “get back on the property market” after a separation.

Under this specific provision, you may be eligible for a stamp duty concession on your new home purchase, even though you have previously owned a property. This is a significant exception to the general rule that the HBCS is for first-time home buyers only.

Eligibility for the Divorce-Related Concession:

  1. The sale of your old home must be a result of the dissolution or irretrievable breakdown of a marriage or de facto relationship.
  2. You must not be cohabitating with your former spouse/partner.
  3. The transaction to transfer your share of the old property must have been formalised by a legal document like a court order or a Binding Financial Agreement.
  4. You must meet the income thresholds and other eligibility criteria of the broader Home Buyer Concession Scheme. These thresholds are updated periodically, so it’s essential to check the current figures on the ACT Revenue Office website.

Type of exemptions

  • Exemption for the Old Home: The transfer of your share of the old home to your former partner as part of your divorce settlement is generally exempt from stamp duty, provided it is done under a formal legal agreement or court order.
  • Concession for the New Home: You may be eligible for a stamp duty concession on the purchase of your new home, even though you were a previous homeowner. This is a special provision under the Home Buyer Concession Scheme for individuals who have sold a property due to a relationship breakdown.
  • Actionable Advice: The legal and financial implications of a divorce can be complex. It is highly recommended that you:
    • Consult a family law solicitor: They can help you with the legal documentation (court orders or BFAs) required to formalise your property settlement and qualify for the stamp duty exemptions.
    • Contact a conveyancer or the ACT Revenue Office: They can provide specific guidance on the eligibility criteria and the process for applying for the stamp duty concession on your new home.

What are the critical dates for Stamp Duty exemptions in  Canberra? 

Here are the critical dates and timeframes to be aware of:

  1. The “Transaction Date”

This is the most critical date. For stamp duty purposes, the “transaction date” is the date you enter into the agreement to purchase the property (the date the contract is signed), not the settlement date. All eligibility for the HBCS is assessed based on this date.

  • Your Eligibility: Your eligibility for the divorce-related concession is assessed at the transaction date. This means that on the day you sign the contract for your new home, you must meet the criteria related to the breakdown of your relationship.
  1. The Formalisation of Your Property Settlement

To be eligible for the concession, the ACT Revenue Office requires evidence that your relationship has irretrievably broken down and that your former property was dealt with as part of a formal property settlement. This is to prevent people from using the scheme to buy a second home without a genuine need.

  • Required Documentation: This is the most important part. You must be able to provide evidence of your property settlement. This can include:
  1. A court order under the Family Law Act 1975.
  2. A Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) under the Family Law Act.
  3. A deed of settlement or other formal separation agreement.

There is no specific timeframe for how long after the divorce the purchase of the new home must occur. The key is that the reason for the sale of the former home and the purchase of the new one is demonstrably a result of the relationship breakdown, supported by the necessary legal documents.

  1. The Residency Requirement

One of the core conditions of the HBCS is that you must occupy the new property as your principal place of residence for a continuous period.

  • Timing: You must begin living in the home within 12 months of the settlement date.
  • Duration: You must then reside in the property for a continuous period of at least 12 months.

Suppose your circumstances change and you cannot meet this requirement. In that case, you must notify the ACT Revenue Office, as you may become ineligible for the concession and be required to pay the full stamp duty amount, along with any penalties or interest.

Summary of Key Dates and Events:

  1. Relationship Breakdown: This is the event that makes you potentially eligible for the concession.
  2. Formal Property Settlement: You must have a legally binding agreement (BFA or court order) regarding the division of your former property. This is the evidence you will need to provide.
  3. Transaction Date: The date you sign the contract for your new home. Your eligibility for the concession is assessed on this day.
  4. Settlement Date: The date you take legal ownership of the new property.
  5. Residency Period: You have a 12-month window from the settlement date to move into the new home, and you must then live there for a continuous period of at least 12 months.

It is crucial to work with a conveyancer or a family law solicitor who has experience with ACT property transactions to ensure you meet all the specific requirements and have the correct documentation. The rules and eligibility criteria are subject to change, so always refer to the official ACT Revenue Office website for the most current information